One virtue of identifying arousal with drive is that it relates differing views (as well as bringing into the focus of attention data that may otherwise be neglected).
The feedback from cortical functioning makes intelligible Mowrer's equating anxiety aroused by threat of pain, and anxiety aroused in some way by cognitive processes related to the ideas of self. Solomon and Wynne's results with sympathectomy are also relevant, since we must not neglect the arousal effect of interoceptor activity; and so is clinical anxiety due to metabolic and nutritional disorders, as well as that of some conflict of cognitive processes.
Obviously these are not explanation that are being discussed, but possible lines of future research; and there is one problem in particular that I would urge should not be forgotten. This is the cortical feedback to the arousal system, in psysiological terms: or in psychological terms, the immediate drive value of cognitive processes, without intermediary. This is psychologically demonstrable, and has been demonstrated repeatedly.
DRIVES AND THE C.N.S. (CONCEPTUAL NERVOUS SYSTEM)[1]
D. O. Hebb (1955)
First published in Psychological Review, 62, 243-254.