None of the hands in this series
exhibited significant change in flow with A1 ,ug/min. With A ,ug/min, however,
eight of the thirteen hands now had 25 % or more vasoconstriction, the mean
for the group being 30 %. With i p,g no less than eight of the ten hands tested
had more than 25 % vasoconstriction.
Thus for the two groups receiving H and i ug adrenaline marked increases
in the mean responses from 11 to 30 % and from 16 to 44 %, respectively, were
observed after sympathectomy. The ratio of postoperative to preoperative
mean responses was about the same for both doses (2-7 and 2-8). The increased
response after sympathectomy is seen (Table 2) to be due especially to changes
in hands 3, 6, 9, 11, 12 and 13, which before operation had minimal constric-
tions but responded with marked reductions in blood flow after sympathectomy.
The altered behaviour of two of these hands is portrayed in Figs. 1 and 2.
Although some of the other seven hands also showed increased vasoconstric-
tion with a given dose of adrenaline after sympathectomy this increase was
less notable.
The paired differences between the hands before and after sympathectomy
are significant at the A .g/min (t = 3-03, P < 0-02), and the i ,ug/min (t = 3-55,
P < 0-01) levels. Of the six hands manifesting notable increases in sensitivity
to adrenaline three were sympathectomized by preganglionic section and three
by ganglionectomy.
J. Physiol. (I955) I29, 53-64
EFFECT OF ADRENALINE AND NORADRENALINE ON
BLOOD VESSELS OF THE HAND BEFORE AND AFTER
SYMPATHECTOMY
BY R. S. DUFF
From the Cardiological Department, St Bartholomew's Hospital and the
Sherrington School of Physiology, St Thomas's Hospital, London
